FREMONT — As attention has grown around how much cities charge developers in impact fees that help pay for parks, fire protection services and roads, Fremont leaders are weighing bumping most of the city’s fees, which are already among the highest in California.

The majority of the Fremont City Council indicated during a meeting Tuesday they are in favor of increasing impact fees on both housing and commercial developers by roughly 4.5 percent, to keep pace with inflation, but noted they’d also support cutting developers of affordable homes a break on fees.

The council also signaled it would support levying a substantial fee increase — nearly 90 percent — on warehouse developments.

“We’re like the capital of warehouses so I definitely think we need to look at increasing the fees there so they’re competitive,” Councilman Raj Salwan said during the meeting.

City staff said the city’s fees for warehouse development has been historically low compared to other cities’ commercial development fees, and the significant increase would bring the city more in line with the market.

In recent years, millions of square feet of industrial buildings set up for warehousing, distribution, manufacturing and research and development, have gone up in a massive development south of the Pacific Commons Shopping Center in Fremont, and landed major tenants including Amazon and UPS.

While commercial fees will likely be raised with little fanfare, the city’s high fees on housing developers are what garner the city the most attention and could be affected by state lawmakers looking to place stricter limits on fees, city staff said.

The city’s high fees have been called out in two studies in 2018 and 2019 from the UC Berkeley Terner Center for Housing Innovation as some of the highest in the state, especially for single-family homes.

A developer of a 3-bedroom home in Fremont would currently be dinged for about $33,000 in city impact fees alone, to help cover the costs of new parks needed for additional residents, as well as fire protection fees, roads and other infrastructure improvements, according to city staff reports.

That figure doesn’t include other steep costs, such as the city’s affordable housing fees charged if a developer doesn’t build affordable units in their project, and Fremont Unified School District’s fees to help accommodate more students from new housing projects.

In 2018, The Terner Center reported that when the full complement of fees are included, a developer building a single-family home could wind up paying just over $150,000 in fees in Fremont.

“There is a bit of a spotlight on Fremont right now with respect to fees on residential development,” Community Development Director Dan Schoenholz told the council Tuesday, while referencing the Terner report from 2019.

“So this has resulted in Fremont sort of being branded at the state level as a high-fee city, and the state is concerned that high impact fees will suppress housing development fees,” Schoenholz said.

Schoenholz said city staff believes the high fees in Fremont are not “out of line with other cities in Silicon Valley,” despite some of the shocking figures seen in those reports.

“Also, our fees have to be higher than in a lot of areas around the state due to the high cost of acquiring land that we need to build parks and for public works projects,” he said.

Fremont currently aims to have have five acres of park space for every 1,000 residents, and Hans Larsen, the city’s public works director, said residents value park space as a high priority.

“We already have attention on Fremont as being a city that has high fees,” he said. “We think it’s somewhat justified, but nevertheless, our fees are higher, and higher fees do impact the cost of development,” he said.

Dennis Martin, of the Building Industry Association Bay Area, asked the council to consider easing the burden on developers by letting them pay their fees as late as possible in the development process, and to have the fees they owe calculated early in the process.

“Fees can have a significant effect on the feasibility of housing that goes forward. So we ask that you be careful and be mindful while adopting additional fees,” Martin said.

Despite high fees, over the last several years, Fremont has exceeded regional housing goals for market rate homes by more than 5,000 units, though it has done very poorly in attracting homebuilders putting up units affordable to those in moderate income brackets, and also has struggled with low- and very low-income units.

The council expressed broad support for lessening the fee burden on developers building affordable homes, as they currently pay the same fees as a market rate builder, which can affect the number of affordable homes produced in the city, staff said.

How much of a discount affordable builders could see is still up in the air. City staff said Fremont will host a meeting with “development stakeholders” on March 25, and the council will likely make a decision on all the fee rates at a meeting in May.